Blogs

7 Ways To Account for Your Employees During an Emergency

Having procedures in place for workplace evacuations is part of what employers should do to ensure their employees’ safety in the event of an emergency. One of the Department of Labor’s minimum requirements for an emergency action plan (EAP) is “Accounting for all employees after an emergency evacuation has been completed.” However, the manner in which an employer should perform this accounting is not specified. Safety and security professionals often have to determine the most effective method on their own, considering a range of factors such as facility type, size, infrastructure, and number of employees. In this blog, we outline seven of the most popular ways we have seen employers check for missing employees.

 

1. Paper Roster

checklist cartoon

Using a paper roster is the most rudimentary form of mustering. With a hint of nostalgia, it throws us back to memories of grade school, lining up in the parking lot and waiting for the teacher to call our names and check us off the list. This system still works well in the classroom, but may not be practical for large corporate buildings with hundreds of employees. In these situations, the rosters have to be kept fastidiously up to date with HR records. Security personnel usually accomplish this by requesting that HR or relevant supervisors maintain an updated list on a monthly, weekly, or even daily basis.

Some companies have found ways to embellish the paper roster method by using the building’s physical access control system. This way, a list can be printed of employees who used their access badge to enter the building that day, helping responders quickly identify who may still be unaccounted for. This method works well in workplaces where employees are required to badge in every day.

Paper rosters have a key advantage of simplicity, needing only a pen and paper to operate. However, they are inherently slow and prone to error, especially if any employee goes to the wrong evacuation station. Also, how many evacuation captains are going to wait around for their roster to finish printing with a real fire in the building?

2. Electronic Roster

Checklist on an electronic tablet

Adapting the traditional roster method for the 21st century, we can enhance the paper list using web technologies. In this method, occupancy data is retrieved from the security system and published electronically. Options here include:

  • Email current occupancy list to evacuation captains.
  • Populating an occupancy list on a tablet at the facility.
  • Pushing an up to date list on the internet.

3. Badge Scanning

Using security badges to quickly scan employees outside the facility can be an improved solution over paper or electronic rosters if implemented correctly. There are many ways to electronically scan badges, including:

Muster reader options: handheld badge scanner, stanchion mounted badge scanner, mobile access panel cart with badge scanner
Muster Reader Options
  • Scanner on a stanchion
  • Scanner built into a small Pelican case or cart
  • Handheld scanning device, either a PDA or tablet

These methods are easiest to use if a campus or facility has a solid network infrastructure. This allows evacuation captains to quickly access the occupancy list through a web page. However, if a catastrophic emergency occurs, like the 2011 Southwest blackout, where all power and cellular data goes out, this type of system still can leave security professionals without critical data about their users.

Of the different options, handheld badge scanners offer several key advantages over stanchion or case-mounted scanners:

  1. Handheld devices are portable and easily carried to any location during an emergency.
  2. Scanners with a screen let you view live occupancy lists and employee information.
  3. Some systems provide backup ways to muster in case someone forgets their badge, such as manually entering their name.
  4. No need for expensive infrastructure or trenching power like with a fixed muster post.
  5. If network connection is lost, some devices can maintain synced lists and continue to function normally.

4. Biometrics

Biometrics is the process of identifying people by something unique about them – their biology, so to speak. Security and mustering systems can incorporate many methods, but in practice, only a few see common adoption. Currently, organizations most widely use fingerprint technology as the primary biometric tool in security. As facial recognition from video and iris recognition technologies continue to advance, more systems are implementing them as well. These biometric methods effectively capture employee presence at evacuation points, serving as a reliable alternative to badge scanning, with the added advantage that they can’t be lost like ID cards.

biometric mustering options: iris, fingerprint, or iris recognition

5. Long Range RFID

Instead of manually scanning employee badges, long-range Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) allows for automatic scanning from a distance. These systems use RFID tags operating in the 900 MHz frequency range, called UHF tags. There are many ways to implement these tags, including:

UHF-Card

  • Added as a sticker to the back of an existing badge.
  • Provided as a separate card.
  • Integrated into a lanyard or badge holder.
  • Built into new access control badges, which would have multiple RFID technologies implemented – the image to the right shows an example of this.

These UHF tags enable personnel to be identified from ranges of up to 25 feet away. This solution can be ideal for verifying when employees exit through known doorways, accounting for people near an evacuation area, or correctly detecting when they exit a facility.

6. Real Time Location Systems (RTLS)

For high-risk environments, like chemical plants or refineries, traditional mustering methods may not offer the speed or accuracy needed during an emergency. Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) provide a faster, more automated way to account for personnel using RFID tags and strategically placed sensors.

Beacon

RTLS uses active RFID tags, which are battery-powered and can be read from more than 100 feet away. These tags enable continuous tracking of the real-time location of employees (hence the name, Real Time Location Systems). Active tags differ from passive UHF tags, mentioned in the above section, which have no battery and must be scanned at close range.

This solution requires placing readers strategically throughout the facility and at designated muster points. When a reader detects a tag, it identifies the employee as being near that location, indicating they’ve reached safety. With this setup, employees can either use RTLS-enabled badges or wear tags on their clothing. Click here to learn more about what to consider when implementing RTLS.

RTLS and geofencing systems inherently show whether employees are inside or outside your facility, which is exactly what a mustering system is designed to do. This eliminates the need for manual check-ins and dramatically reduces headcounting time. Another consideration is that RTLS platforms typically operate through their own separate management portals and are rarely integrated directly with the security system.

7. Cell Phone and SMS Based Systems

Some employee mustering solutions use the mobile infrastructure to support their evacuation requirements. There are two main types of these systems: app-based systems and SMS-based systems.

android and apple logos and text sms icon

App-based solutions can either use a phone’s geolocation to determine if an employee is outside a danger area, or may require the user to actively check in. Alternatively, SMS systems notify users via text and may or may not have 2-way communication, allowing employees to indicate if they are safe or require assistance. These types of solutions rely on two things to function effectively:

  • All users must have a mobile phone and must have it with them during the evacuation.
  • Facilities must be located in areas with reliable cell coverage.

One advantage of these solutions is that they eliminate the need for external scanners altogether.

Things To Keep In Mind

No emergency evacuation system by itself is perfect.

  • If a building is burning, evacuation captains are unlikely to instinctively grab rosters, tablets, or readers.
  • Employees are likely to leave behind badges and/or phones in an emergency.
  • Without complete information, first responders must still enter burning buildings to verify that everyone is safe.
  • Emergencies, by their very nature, are unexpected, and situations can quickly get out of hand.

Keep in mind that people can behave unpredictably, especially when it comes to personal safety. However, having and practicing an emergency action plan will better ensure the safety of your employees by providing them guidance, no matter which mustering solution you choose.

Telaeris has over 20 years of experience helping security teams streamline their emergency mustering processes. If we can help you upgrade how you account for employees in an evacuation, please contact us.

This blog was originally published in May 2016 and has been updated to clarify various technical terms.

Comments

  1. Eli says:

    This article is an excellent reminder to always know the emergency procedures for any building where you spend a lot of time. I didn’t realize there were so many strategies for keeping track of your employees’ locations, but as a proprietor or boss, it is an integral part of responding to an emergency. It comes second only to training your employees on how to evacuate and use evacuation devices to help those who may be injured or disabled.

  2. Jeanna Fresquez says:

    I would like to see if I can get more feed back on how employees are validated for and what takes place after an emergency evacuation.

  3. Hi Jeanna – we will be contacting you shortly! This is a key part of what we do as a company.

  4. Nycil Paulose says:

    Hi, I need to learn more about the head count solutions you can offer. Especially for an operating plant without specific entry or exit points. We are concerned with head count within the plant not at only the the facility boundary.

    Do you have any Indian contact, who can explain?

  5. Hello Nycil – we have a few different options for keeping count of your employees and contractors, depending upon your operating environment. If your employees are required to wear hardhats and you have choke points that they can be directed through for entry and exit, you could use UHF RFID, which would give you a cheaper per employee cost. However, if your campus is truly open, with a known perimeter, we have a great active RFID system which would let you know if people are inside or outside of your perimeter. We will reach out to you to discuss.

    Additionally, we deploy our solutions worldwide, so we can certainly support you in India.

  6. Office 365 Migration Support says:

    Another very strong and powerful post I’ve read some of your previous posts and finally decided to drop a comment on this one. I signed up for your newsletter, so keep up the informative posts!

  7. Awesome article, thanks for sharing this useful list with us. It was really very informative.

  8. Effan Kadzim says:

    Hi, I want to ask, what is the best solution for head count roll call ,especially for a large building with a lot of different department. We are concerned that we may not get an accurate headcount when at assembly point with an average of 1500 workers.

    Thanks.
    Effan, Malaysia

  9. I would use a distributed handheld solution for a situation like yours. The nice thing about using handhelds at the evacuation points is that 7 handhelds could cover your entire population, and even let you know if someone went to the wrong evacuation point, because they all stay in sync with each other. If you wanted to keep more departments separate, you could easily add extra handhelds.

  10. William powney says:

    Greetings from Malta

    I would be glad to learn about your head count systems to be deployed in museums. They would definitely be required to cover our employees, visitors and contractors.

    Thanks and regards
    William powney

  11. Waqar Ahmad says:

    Greeting from UAE,

    I would like to know about a headcount system. Do you have any kind of headcount cameras or some solutions?

    Thanks,
    Waqar

  12. ELIO ROMERO says:

    I am looking to improve our Emergency Evacuation accountability process. Can you please give a call to discuss our interest.

    Thanks,
    Elio

  13. Patti says:

    I am interested in your hand helds. We have 420 team members who could evacuate to 2 different locations.

  14. Heejin Seo, Marketing Coordinator says:

    Hi Patti, thank you for your interest in XPressEntry. We will be contacting you shortly!

  15. Sam Dalton says:

    I have seen multiple solutions over the years having worked on over 50 Marine vessels as well as Drilling units. I prefer the card system at muster points for a number of reasons. Electronic systems can fail in a fire situation and tagging systems may work in a planned drill but people in an emergency while sleeping are rarely organised and will inevitably leave these behind. Web based systems are out as we rarely have reliable internet or wifi coverage due to the large amounts of metal as well as the number of UHF communication systems employed during an emergency. The benefits come back to lists which again rely on computer access which becomes ineffective if you lose power. T cards are located at the stations and if kept up to date provide indication of who should be at which muster just by looking if you are not you know it is an alternate muster station. Turning cards invests people in actively participating in the muster and the cards not turned can easily be gathered in event of abandon to give an idea of who is missing to initiate rescue.

  16. Breanna Fancher says:

    I’m trying to determine the proper term to use for an individual who is present (physically) at a Muster Station but not on the roll call list. Is there an industry accepted term for this? Thanks!

  17. Donna Burnette says:

    Hello, I am interested in learning more about your evacuation solutions for businesses during an emergency.

  18. We have not heard a specific term. At Telaeris, we call these people “unexpected arrivals”, but this is not an industry accepted term. People often go to the wrong assembly areas, either due to confusion or due to the desire to stay with whoever they were meeting with in person. But with XPressEntry, no matter what assembly area your people arrive to, they are correctly accounted for by the XPressEntry mustering system. Most importantly this information is communicated back to the evacuation captains at each station, so they know the people on their roster are correctly accounted for.

  19. Raymond Migneco says:

    I manage an office/factory with 320 employees in 105000 sq. ft. building that has multiple exits and group locations. what is an acceptable time frame for 100% employee accountability? i came in 9 minutes for all rosters to be complete and in one location

  20. Hi Raymond – We like to be able to account for everyone in under 10 minutes. Your experience of nine minutes to fully account for 320 employees in a large facility is a good time. The next concern you should look at is how your company accounts for every person that comes into the building to make sure you are not having people tailgate on entry as well as correctly tracking when they leave. Keep up the great work!

  21. Pat Davis says:

    Please send me Pricing and info on this as I’m setting up evac for my facilities

    Pat Davis Safety Coordinator
    YES

Leave A Comment

Email Subscription

Get the latest updates sent directly to your inbox!

By signing up, I understand and agree to the email marketing terms and conditions